It tells me that this month not going well. Which have overdue payments, which has to solve a problem with the Bank but that, nothing, that next month as very late pay me what I should... We have a year as well. Also next month I will pay. Nor to me many other suckers that once we trust in the seriousness of his company and his willingness to comply with their commitments.

One of these days we hog that the company has closed. To cal y canto, at once, without leaving a trace. Soon will appear a new company, with other social reason, on behalf of who knows who, but that will be the same dog with another collar. And a lot of suppliers will stay free of charge. And nothing will happen, absolutely nothing. It will continue to work as if such a thing. It is even likely that many of the affected creditors again you give resignedly, initially rabid spot and then, in the long run, as others. Over the years, to engage in other few again and the cycle recomience. There are true specialists in opening and closing companies, debtors of lengthy resume, fraudsters cum laude. Surely you all know more than one, and more than two.

It is likely that some outraged creditor decides to take the case to the courts. But it is almost impossible to prove that he is a fraudster, would have to prove that he studied with mood prior orders not to pay them, which is what distinguishes the scam of the non-payment, and that is very difficult to prove. So they tend to come out unscathed. And the debt is not settled because, of course, always are insolvent, despite moving around in luxury cars and living in mansions of high standing. Acknowledge him. In this country, who will not pay, you don't pay.

On the one hand, this is a problem of a legal nature. The Bankruptcy Act of 2003, which abolished the bankruptcies and defaults and installed the contest of creditors, was intended to solve the problem of firms with liquidity problems to facilitate its viability and to ensure the payment of creditorsgreatly increasing the responsibilities of administrators. However, despite the improvements made in subsequent decrees, the crisis has demonstrated the inefficiency of this tortuous procedural path and the vast majority of contests end up with the liquidation of the company and the majority of creditors unpaid.

But my thinking is not directed to companies who, by circumstances of market, unfavourable financial circumstances, unforeseen technological leaps, or many other reasons, have entered into insolvency and cannot meet its payment obligations. This is part of the risk inherent in any commercial activity. And a good understanding between debtor and creditors, which prioritise the survival of the delinquent business, often the best path. Even if they will certainly improve the law to facilitate these processes.

My comment is not directed them, those who can not pay, but the others, those who do not want to pay. These, badly called entrepreneurs, tricksters unscrupulous, without the lighter sense of the responsibility for the obligations, acting in bad faith, indifferent to the harm that can cause to third parties its negligence. These continue to be immune as much as we improve business laws. Continue to close business and opening them again before the resignation of the workers affected and the indifference of others. And that's the problem.

Until there is no real social against practices such rejection, unless these characters are not mentioned as common criminals, until other entrepreneurs are not consider them suitable to continue to trade with them, they will continue to be rampant at your leisure. And we will all be, in large part, responsible.