The double lie of the fake penis

First lie - Mr. X felt disappointed. I read in the press how two Olympic athletes had deceived him. He had a great experience in the observance of the urination of sportsmen that rotated in a boat of plastic guilt or innocence and had a good archive of more diverse penises in his memory. And these two athletes occupied a strong position in this particular ranking. But it was a lie. The two cheats had resorted to a strange contraption which included a false penis from plastic to trick Mr. X and had since then been. That size, texture, were due to the plastic material of the fake penis and the illusion of the perfect penis also vanished with the lie. Second lie - with Mr. X all the anti-doping apparatus fell initially on deception. Plastics had a good share of responsibility in this. The aforementioned penis, the tube that carries urine from a false bladder, also of plastic, and the blister in which we imagine being marketed this, they put the plastic in a difficult situation and we do not mean the embarrassment of his physical in the athlete's body locationin this case unusual. Will all the plastics industry remove chest and defend their opportunities. Initially the plastics were a material replacing others. Now no longer. Today, plastics are a material from which they see a huge variety of products, many of them totally dependent on these materials. In the case known as "the double lie of the fake penis" plastics have surprised us by its ability to acquire forms and textures so real that they can even convince an expert in bodies such as Mr. X. Added to this is the price, clear. It can be assumed that such gadget is priced within reach of many pockets, because neither the materials nor the technology required seem complex. Here the plastics are also unique. Do or anyone imagine this same news but with a penis of wood?