FO77 - FuturEnviro

www.futurenviro.es | Febrero-Marzo February-March 2021 23 Gestión y tratamiento de agua | Water management and treatment dernizarla aún más con inversión en I+D+i y analizar cada proyecto para que suponga impacto ambiental mínimo, pero atreviéndose a actuar. “No hacer ninguna intervención en la naturaleza, supondría bloquear el desarrollo de las zonas rurales por falta de empleo” Lo moderno es superar un discurso político de lucha por el poder, nacionalismos y regionalismos (se está hablando incluso de nuevas comunidades autónomas) y mirar por el bien común. No se trata de una lucha por sacar “mi” proyecto adelante, sino en ver qué podemos hacer entre todos para resolver los problemas ambientales con toda la tecnología disponible y luchar por el empleo verde. Lo moderno es defender la unidad de cuenca (los límites naturales por encima de los políticos y administrativos); esto implica la renovación de las Confederaciones Hidrográficas para que tengan algo fundamental: dinero. Aquí, un debate clave, será la gestión de la energía hidroeléctrica producida en las mismas y la posible financiación de forma clara por este medio. Esto se puede conseguir tanto con explotación directa (a través de la Confederación correspondiente o de una empresa pública, como ya se hiciera antiguamente con la extinta ENHER) o mediante sistema concesional, a través del pago de los correspondientes cánones. Para poder avanzar, no hay que tener miedo a hablar claramente de infraestructuras (duras y blandas). No puede ser peor el remedio que la enfermedad, en referencia a los casos de depuradoras paralizadas por embrollos judiciales, mientras el agua sigue siendo vertida al río contaminada, habiendo invertido además una gran cantidad de dinero que termina por malgastarse. “No hay que tener miedo a hablar claramente de infraestructuras” Es necesario avanzar conjuntamente -empresas y administraciones- para ponerse de acuerdo en asuntos de calado. El sistema de decisión exclusiva por parte de la administración correspondiente y sacar obras por el sistema clásico de licitación, se ha de revisar. Hay que dar cabida a todos los recursos disponibles y aprovechar el músculo financiero de las empresas en momentos en los que los recursos A strong case is made for development, but only for its positive and most visible aspects, while the negative, and sometimes not so obvious aspects, are concealed. The electric car is defended without recognition of the environmental implications of battery manufacturing. European guidelines on energy are accepted without taking account of their defence of pumped-storage power plants (which can involve the creation of new reservoirs). These are just a couple of examples. There are many more. “A strong case is made for development, but only for its positive and most visible aspects, while the negative, and sometimes not so obvious aspects, are concealed” Spain needs to move forward, to take advantage of European funds by exploiting them to the utmost in order to protect the environment. This does not mean making no intervention in nature, because that would mean blocking the development of rural areas due to lack of employment. It means taking advantage of available technology, upgrading it further through investment in R&D&i and analysing each project to ensure minimal environmental impact, whilst at the same time not being afraid to act. “Making no intervention in nature would mean blocking the development of rural areas due to lack of employment” Progressiveness is moving beyond a political discourse of power struggle, nationalism and regionalism (there is even talk of new autonomous communities) and working for the common good. It is not a question of fighting to get “my” project up and running but rather of seeing what we can do together to solve environmental problems with all the available technology, and fighting for green jobs. Progressiveness is defending river basin unity (natural boundaries taking precedence over political and administrative boundaries). This implies renovation of River Basin Management Authorities so that something vital is made available to them, i.e., money. A key debate here will be the management of the hydroelectric energy produced in river basin districts and the potential for transparent financing by means of this energy. This could be achieved either by direct operation (through the corresponding River Basin Management Authority or a public company, as was done in the past with the now-defunct national hydroelectric power company ENHER) or by means of a concession system, through the payment of the corresponding fees. In order to move forward, there must be no fear of speaking clearly about infrastructures (hard and soft). The cure cannot be worse than the disease, in reference to the cases of sewage treatment plants paralysed by judicial entanglements, while contaminated water continues to be discharged into rivers, despite the fruitless investment of a large amount of money. “there must be no fear of speaking clearly about infrastructures” It is necessary for companies and public authorities to move forward together and to reach agreement on important issues. The system of exclusive decision-making by the corresponding public authority and the execution of works through the classic tendering systemmust be reviewed. There must be a place for all available resources and the financial muscle of companies must be availed Embalse de Navacerrada | Navacerrada Reservoir

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Njg1MjYx