44 VINO Sin embargo, al utilizar paneles entrenados, tenemos que tener en cuenta el tiempo necesario para la selección de los individuos, su entrenamiento para el producto especi cado, el mantenimiento y el coste económico. Esto hace que hoy en día se estén desa- rrollando técnicas alternativas que emplean consumidores no entrenados, con resultados estadísticamente robustos. Nuevas técnicas rápidas para conocer la opinión y preferencias del consumidor Las nuevas metodologías rápidas para la caracterización sensorial mediante consumidores no entrenados o semi entrenados, han sido clasi cadas por Varela y Ares (2014) en dos grandes bloques. Por una parte, existen los métodos de selección de atributos Referencias • Adams, J., Williams, A., Lancaster, B., & Foley, M. (2007). Advantages and uses of check-all-that-apply response compared to traditional scaling of attributes for salty snacks. Paper presented at the 7th Pangborn sensory science symposium. • ASTM. (2004). Standard de nitions of terms relating to sensory evaluation of materials and products. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2004. • Brandão, E., Soares, S., Mateus, N., & de Freitas, V. (2014). Human saliva protein pro le: In uence of food ingestion. Food Research International, 64, 508-513. • De Wijk, R. A., & Prinz, J. F. (2006). Mechanisms underlying the role of friction in oral texture. Journal of texture studies, 37(4), 413-427. • Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van Delft, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Stieger, M. (2015). Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi- solid food gels: Part 1: Comparison between QDA, progressive pro ling and TDS. Food Hydrocolloids, • Dijksterhuis, G., Flipsen, M., & Punter, P. (1994). Principal component analysis of TI-curves: three methods compared. Food Quality and Preference, 5(1-2), 121-127. • Ferrer-Gallego, R., Hernández-Hierro, J. M., Rivas-Gonzalo, J. C., & Escribano-Bailón, M. T. (2014). Sensory evaluation of bitterness and astringency sub-qualities of wine phenolic compounds: synergistic e ect and modulation by aromas. Food Research International, 62, 1100-1107. • Guinard, J. X., Pangborn, R. M., & Lewis, M. J. (1986). Preliminary studies on acidity-astringency interactions in model solutions and wines. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 37(8), 811-817. • Holway, A. H., & Hurvich, L. M. (1937). Di erential gustatory sensitivity to salt. The American Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 37-48. • Hopfer, H., & Heymann, H. (2014). Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists? Food Quality and Preference, 32, 221-233. • Jack, F. R., Piggot, J. R., & Paterson, A. (1994). Analysis of textural changes in hard cheese during mastication by progressive pro ling. Journal of Food Science, 59(3), 539-543. • Kullaa, A. M., Asikainen, P., Herrala, M., Ukkonen, H., & Mikkonen, J. J. (2014). Microstructure of oral epithelial cells as an underlying basis for salivary mucosal pellicle. Ultrastructural pathology, 38(6), 382-386. • Laguna, L., Bartolomé, B., & Moreno-Arribas, M. V. (2017). Mouthfeel perception of wine: Oral physiology, components and instrumental characterization. Trends in food science & technology, 59, 49-59. • Medel-Marabolí, M., Romero, J. L., Obreque-Slier, E., Contreras, A., & Peña-Neira, A. (2017). E ect of a commercial tannin on the sensorial temporality of astrin- gency. Food Research International, 102 (Supplement C), 341-347. • Meillon, S., Urbano, C., Guillot, G., & Schlich, P. (2010). Acceptability of partially dealcoholized wines – Measuring the impact of sensory and information cues on overall liking in real-life settings. Food Quality and Preference, 21(7), 763-773. • Meillon, S., Urbano, C., & Schlich, P. (2009). Contribution of the Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle di erences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference, 20(7), 490-499. • Muñoz-González, C., Feron, G., Guichard, E., Rodri ́guez-Bencomo, J. J., Martin-Alvarez, P. J., Moreno-Arribas, M. V., & Pozo-Bayo ́n, M. A. (2014). Understanding the role of saliva in aroma release from wine by using static and dynamic headspace conditions. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 62(33), 8274-8288. • Neyraud, E., Palicki, O., Schwartz, C., Nicklaus, S., & Feron, G. (2012). Variability of human saliva composition: possible relationships with fat perception and liking. Archives of oral biology, 57(5), 556-566. • Pagès, J. (2003). Recueil direct de distances sensorielles: application à l'évaluation de dix vins blancs du Val-de-Loire. Sciences des aliments, 23(5-6), 679-688. • Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., ... Köster, E. (2009). Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 450-455. • Piombino, P., Genovese, A., Esposito, S., Moio, L., Cutolo, P. P., Chambery, A., ... Ercolini, D. (2014). Saliva from obese individuals suppresses the release of aroma compounds from wine. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85611. • Sie ermann, J. (2000). Le pro l ash–un outil rapide et innovant d’évaluation sensorielle descriptive. L’innovation: de l’idee au succes–Douziemes rencontres AGORAL, 335-340. • Tabak, L. A., Levine, M. J., Mandel, I. D., & Ellison, S. A. (1982). Role of salivary mucins in the protection of the oral cavity. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 11(1), 1-17. • Teillet, E., Schlich, P., Urbano, C., Cordelle, S., & Guichard, E. (2010). Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 967-976. • Varela, P., & Ares, G. (eds.) (2014). Chapeter 1. In: Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer pro ling: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, New York. • Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Medina, K., Boido, E., & Ares, G. (2017). Sensory characterization of the astringency of commercial Uruguayan Tannat wines. Food Research International, 102, 425-434. • Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Medina, K., Boido, E., & Ares, G. (2015). How do consumers describe wine astringency? Food Research International, 78, 321-326.